Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Colo. App. 124 - Oman v. Morris

28 Colo. App. 124 - Oman v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
6
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLC (2006), Stadtfeld v. Stadtfeld (1996)

41 state decisions

25019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Schiess · England v. Colorado Agency Co. · Self v. Watt · Meagher v. Neal · Burton v. Garner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where there is no transcript before the court on appeal, the regularity of the trial court's judgment and the competency of the evidence upon which that judgment is based must be presumed. [Citations.] We are therefore limited in our review to those items of error which do not necessitate consideration of the transcript. [Citations.]" Oman v. Morris, Colo. App., 471 P.2d 430, 432 (1970).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “establishes a prima facie right to the property, or to an interest therein, which is the subject of the action and is in possession of an adverse party and such property ... [is] in danger of being lost, removed beyond the jurisdiction of the court, or materially injured or impaired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.