Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Colo. App. 85 - Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Smith

28 Colo. App. 85 - Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
January 1990
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 1990

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

150197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams Express Co. v. Croninger · Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & Stahl · Divack v. Goldberg · Thomas Electronics, Incorporated v. HW Taynton Company · Herring v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Since the enactment of the so-called “Carmack Amendment” to the Interstate Commerce Act ... in 1906, an interstate carrier’s liability has been governed exclusively by Federal law. Allied Van Lines Inc. v. Smith, 28 Colo.App. 85 , 470 P.2d 926, 928 (1970).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.