Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 CONNAPP 402 - State v. Rumore

State v. Rumore’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably State v. Ulen (1993), State v. Lee (1993)

72 state decisions

4101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Evans · Lewis v. United States · In re Disbarment of Adelman · City of New York v. Seawall Associates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there [is] ... sufficient direct or circumstantial evidence or a combination of both presented to the jury from which it may find such injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, we apply a two part test. First, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict. Second, we determine whether upon the facts so construed and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom the [jury] reasonably could have concluded that the cumulative force of the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt .... This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict .... On appeal, we do not ask whether there is a reasonable view of the evidence that would support a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. We ask, instead, whether there is a reasonable view of the evidence that supports the jury's verdict of guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes serious disfigurement , serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function of any bodily organ.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.