Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 CONNAPP 733 - Collins v. Goldberg

Collins v. Goldberg’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably 89 Conn. App. 850 - Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction (2005), Schallenkamp v. Delponte (1992)

84 state decisions

6301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kilduff v. Adams, Inc. · Volck v. Muzio · Plourde v. Liburdi · Saradjian v. Saradjian · Board of Education v. City of New Haven

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the words of a statute are clear . . . courts will not speculate as to any supposed intention because the question before a court then is not what the legislature actually intended, but what intention it expressed by the words that it used. . . . In the absence of ambiguity, statutory language should be given its plain and ordinary meaning.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause the plaintiff failed to brief the other claims set forth in the complaint, the trial court properly considered them abandoned.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) Did the police officer have probable cause to arrest the person for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drug or both or while his ability to operate such motor vehicle is impaired by the consumption of intoxicating liquor; (2) was such person placed under arrest; (3) did such person refuse to submit to such test or analysis; and (4) was such person operating the motor vehicle.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.