Hubel v. Dick’s Empirical Analysis
28 F. 132 · 1886
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1932
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Railway Company v. Sayles · Miller v. Brass Co. · Gage v. Herring · Mathews v. Machine Co. · Detroit Lubricator Manuf'g Co. v. Renchard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““6. The removable mould plate, bearing a series of capsule moulds secured thereto at regular intervals, combined with, and arranged to be hold by and withdrawn from, the supporting frame, and when used as and for the purposes set forth.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hubel v. Waldie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.