Fagan v. Cullen’s Empirical Analysis
28 F. 843 · 1886
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1925
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mason v. Sargent · Leech v. Kay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All moneys paid into any court of the United States, or received by the officers thereof, in any cause pending or adjudicated in such court shall he forthwith deposited with the .Treasurer, an assistant treasurer, or a designated depository of the United States, in the name and to the credit of such court.” Rev. St. 995 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 711) ; 5 Fed. Stat. Anno. 70; Fagan v. Cullen (C. C.) 28 Fed. 843 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““No money deposited as aforesaid shall be withdrawn except by order of the judge or judges of said courts respectively, in term or in vacation, to be signed by such judge or judges, and to be entered and certified of record by the dork; anil every such' order shall state the cause in, or account upon which, it is drawn.” Id. § 996.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.