Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 F.1d 855 - The Noddleburn

The Noddleburn’s Empirical Analysis

28 F. 855 · 1886

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
9
cited 9 times by the Supreme Court
June 2019
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (9 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019

6 federal appellate · 2 district ·

6018861890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hough v. Railway Co. · The Belgenland · Northern Pacific Railroad v. Herbert · Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Ross · Northern Pac Co v. Herbert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in consideration of the neglect and indifference with which the libelant was treated by the master after his injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.