Roxana Petroleum Corp. v. Sutter’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.2d 159 · 1928
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2013
5 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Van Winkle v. . Van Winkle · Richardson v. Palmer · Paine v. Consumers' Forwarding & Storage Co. · Tousley v. Galena Mining & Smelting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The reason for the rule is equally applicable to a deed of land abutting on a railroad right of way as to a deed of land abutting a public highway. The same narrow strip exists. -It is seldom of any present value to the grantor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“likely to be productive of disputes and litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“seldom of any present value to the grantor”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.