In re Kalpachnikoff’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.2d 288 · 1928
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1962
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States of America v. Solomon Louis Ginsberg · Johannessen v. United States · United States v. Cantini · In re Schneider · United States v. Rockteschell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There are several different words in our language which in common speech convey the like meaning. Among them are ‘lives’ and ‘resides,’ and phrases of the like import, such as ‘makes his home’ and ‘has his domicile.’ The idea, meant to be conveyed by these and the like words and phrases of common usage, is clear enough, but the meaning of the word ‘residence’ or ‘domicile,’ when employed in a statute, is often pro-vocative of dispute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Clark v. Settle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.