In re Russell’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.2d 48 · 1928
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
July 1955
most recently cited
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1955
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 112 (§ 233 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)
Relies on In re Farley · In re Barden · In re Wood · Willis v. Hart · In re Langslow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.