Aycock v. O'Brien’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.2d 817 · 1928
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2004
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty · Coffey v. United States · Stone v. United States · United States Milwaukee Social Democratic Pub Co v. Burleson · American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While within a limited range courts of equity will grant relief against orders of this character, it is well settled that they will not interfere where there has been no mistake of law, a fair hearing has been accorded, and the findings of the administrative officers upon issues of fact are supported by substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.