Baker Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Chaske’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.3d 1466 · 1994
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 27 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 124 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably 189 Wis. 2d 541 - Northern States Power Co. v. Bugher (1995), National Satellite Sports, Inc. v. Eliadis, Inc. (2001)
30 federal appellate · 27 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1360
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · United States v. Wheeler · Montana v. United States · Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 124 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the threat of irreparable harm to the movant; (2) the state of balance between this harm and the injury that granting the injunction will inflict on other parties litigant; (3) the probability that movant will succeed on the merits; and (4) the public interest.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“No single factor in itself is dispositive; in each case all of the factors must be considered to determine whether on balance they weigh towards granting the injunction.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“i. Alternative determinations by court of first instance. If a judgment of a court of first instance is based on determinations of two issues, either of which standing independently would be sufficient to support the result, the judgment is not conclusive with respect to either issue standing alone.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.