No. 92-56393’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2024
1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Delaware v. Prouse · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Michigan v. Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the date of the accrual of a cause of action to which a claim relates is the date upon which the cause of action would be deemed to have accrued within the meaning of the statute of limitations which would be applicable thereto if there were no requirement that a claim be presented to and be acted upon by the public entity before an action could be commenced thereon”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Discovery is defined by the California courts as the point at which 'the plaintiff is aware of both the physical manifestation of the injury and [suspects] its negligent cause.' ") (citations omitted). 11 Thus, under the delayed discovery rule, 3 the statute begins to run when a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position is on "inquiry notice”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ward
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.