Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 F.3d 165 - Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission’s Empirical Analysis

28 F.3d 165 · 1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
December 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2013

5 federal appellate ·

50199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Greater Boston Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., a Massachusettscorporation, Intervenor. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Greater Boston Televisioncorporation, a Massachusetts Corporation, Intervenor. Charles River Civic Television, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors. Whdh, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Boston Broadcasters, Inc., Intervenor. Greater Boston Tv Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Whdh, Inc., Boston Broadcastersinc., Intervenors · Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch · McLouth Steel Products Corporation v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, Inc. v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services · National Rural Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “FASB change adopted by the Commission is not a change under control of the carrier, and, once mandated by the Commission, the change satisfies the control criterion [of the exogenous cost rule].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Commission meant for the `control' test to be satisfied simply by the fact of exogenous imposition of the accounting rule, without concern for the underlying costs covered by the rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no GAAP change can be given exogenous treatment until [FASB] has actually approved the change and it has become effective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.