Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 F.3d 26 - Stephenson v. Reno

Stephenson v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis

28 F.3d 26 · 1994

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Boyd v. Biggers (1994), Robinson v. Jones (1998)

35 federal appellate · 4 district ·

480199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Heck v. Humphrey · Rodriguez v. Holmes · Spina v. Aaron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reversed on direct appeal, expunged by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or called into question by a federal court's issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Heck dictates that a cause of action seeking damages under Sec. 1983 for an unconstitutional conviction or sentence does not accrue until the conviction or sentence has been invalidated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “cannot establish the elements of a Bivens action until his conviction has been declared invalid or otherwise impugned....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.