United States v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.3d 38 · 1994
Citation profile
40 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3572 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 659
Relies on Gometz v. United States · United States v. Fountain · United States v. Arvanitis · United States v. Ahmad · United States v. Mahoney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), directs the sentencing court to consider”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'(1) it is not improbable that the judge failed to consider the mandatory factor and was influenced thereby, or (2) the judge explicitly repudiated the mandatory factor.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“delegate[ ] to the probation department its authority to establish a payment schedule.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.