Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 F.3d 433 - Wilson v. Whitley

Wilson v. Whitley’s Empirical Analysis

28 F.3d 433 · 1994

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Infante (2005), Rector v. Johnson (1997)

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the testimony of a witness who might have been impeached is strongly corroborated by additional evidence supporting a guilty verdict, the undisclosed evidence is generally not found to be material.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'the withheld evidence would seriously undermine the testimony of a key witness on an essential issue or there is no strong corroboration, the withheld evidence has been found to be material.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Brady rights are not denied where the information was fully available to the defendant and his reason for not obtaining and presenting such information was his lack of reasonable diligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.