Christopher Sequa Corporation v. Christopher’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.3d 512 · 1994
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably National Gypsum Company Insurance Company of North America v. Ngc Settlement Trust & Asbestos Claims Management Corporation (1997), National Gypsum Company Century Indemnity Co (2000)
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Bank of Marin v. England · City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]ue process requires only notice that is both adequate to apprise a party of the pendency of an action affecting its rights and timely enough to allow the party to present its objections.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a firm and definite conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. The notice must be of such nature as reasonably to convey the required information, and it must afford a reasonable time for those interested to make their appearance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.