United States v. Bencs’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.3d 555 · 1994
Citation profile
50 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Osie (Slip Opinion) (2014), State v. Myers (Slip Opinion) (2018)
50 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7206 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Olano · United States v. Agurs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Brady generally does not apply to delayed disclosure of exculpatory information, but only to a complete failure to disclose”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[m]ateriality pertains to the issue of guilt or innocence, and not to the defendant's ability to prepare for 10. For the same reasons as stated in footnote five, we reject Widmer's argument that disclosing the withheld information would have likely altered the course of litigation by prompting the trial court to grant his subpoena requests or sustain his Motion to Confront Lead Investigator. - 32 - Warren CA2012-02-008 trial”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed, the result of the trial would have been different.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.