Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 F.3d 746 - Brumley v. United States Department of Labor

Brumley v. United States Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

28 F.3d 746 · 1994

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
January 2018
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2018

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

170199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 8101 · 5 U.S.C. § 8105 · 5 U.S.C. § 8128

Relies on Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management · Woodruff v. United States Department of Labor, Office of Workers Compensation Program · Owens v. Brock · Ca 79-2883 Merged Area in Counties of Benton Cedar Iowa Johnson Jones Linn and Washington State of Iowa v. Cleland a H L

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The action of the Secretary or his designee in allowing or denying a payment under this subchapter is — (1) final and conclusive for all purposes and with respect to all questions of law and fact; and (2) not Subject to review by another official of the United States or by a court by mandamus or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plain meaning of [§ 8128] shows Congressional intent 'to bar judicial review altogether.' However, it has been held that the preclusion-ofreview statute cannot serve to immunize [the Department of Labor] from judicial review when its actions violate the Constitution or a clear statutory mandate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.