Boykin v. Leapley’s Empirical Analysis
28 F.3d 788 · 1994
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2015
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Irvin v. Dowd · California v. Trombetta · Remmer v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any statement given freely and voluntarily without any compelling influences is, of course, admissible in evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 98-2449“subjected to compelling influences, psychological ploys, or direct questioning”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 98-2449
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.