28 F. Supp. 3d 82 - Ahmed v. Hosting.Com’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (§ 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Allen v. Wright · Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters · Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc · Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co. · Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a social networking [site] that allows users to communicate by creating Facebook 'pages.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. MacRae v. Mattos“Under section 1114, the allegedly infringed mark must be registered in the USPTO.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.