Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 IDAHO 753 - Harshbarger v. Eby

Harshbarger v. Eby’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2019

9 state decisions

2019161920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seattle National Bank v. Carter · Wilson v. Town of Monticello · Kuhland v. Sedgwick · Hayes v. Silver Creek & Panoche Land & Water Co. · Smock v. Pierson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a species of property subject to sale by the proprietor, and which may be sold by order of court... .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.