28 Ill. 2d 199 - Skaggs v. Junis’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably 99 Ill. 2d 389 - Foutch v. O'BRYANT (1984), 195 Ill. 2d 426 - Webster v. Hartman (2001)
54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 36 Ill. App. 2d 55 - Smith v. Smith · 27 Ill. App. 2d 251 - Skaggs v. Junis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In such a situation, unless there is a contrary indication in the order or in the record, it is presumed that the court heard adequate evidence to support the decision that was rendered ° ° °. Where it is alleged that the evidence presented was actually insufficient to support the court’s finding, the burden of preserving said evidence rests with the party who appeals from said order. No record of the evidence heard on May 23 and 24 regarding the ° # ” claim is before this court and, therefore, it must be assumed that the evidence that was heard fully supported the court’s finding 9 9 9■” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.