Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Ill. App. 2d 1 - Haskell v. Siegmund

28 Ill. App. 2d 1 - Haskell v. Siegmund’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2003 · most notably 162 Ill. 2d 314 - People v. Cruz (1994), 156 Ill. App. 3d 76 - Lindenmier v. City of Rockford (1987)

39 state decisions

14019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hickman v. Taylor · 11 Ill. 2d 84 - The People v. Moses · 19 Ill. 2d 318 - The People v. Wolff · 17 Ill. 2d 242 - River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance · 3 Ill. 2d 318 - Simmon v. Iowa Mutual Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There may be cases in which admissions at pre-trial depositions are so deliberate, detailed, and unequivocal, as to matters within the party’s personal knowledge, that they will conclusively bind the party-deponent, and he will not be heard to contradict the admissions at the trial. See, for example, Meier v. Pocius, 17 Ill. App. 2d 332, 335 , 150 N.E.2d 215, 216-217 (1st Dist. 1958); see also 4 Wigmore on Evidence, secs. 1063-1067 (3rd ed. 1940).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 71 Ill. App. 3d 562 - Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
  2. ““Disclosure of memoranda, reports or documents made by or for a party in preparation for trial . . . shall not be required through any discovery procedure.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 30 Ill. App. 2d 159 - Stimpert v. Abdnour

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.