28 Ill. App. 3d 373 - Mier v. Staley’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 71 Ill. App. 3d 267 - People v. Choate (1979), 124 Ill. App. 3d 56 - Handley v. Unarco Industries, Inc. (1984)
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 31 Ill. 2d 69 - Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp. · Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co. · 59 Ill. 2d 102 - People v. Armour · 51 Ill. 2d 274 - Sullivan v. Midlothian Park District · 51 Ill. 2d 103 - Bridgewater v. Hotz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Plaintiff also asserts that immunity results in a violation of the constitutional provisions giving every person a remedy for his injuries. (Article I, § 12, Illinois Constitution of 1970, Article II, § 19, Illinois Constitution of 1970). "These sections do not require that any specific form or remedy be provided Plaintiff, rather they are the expression of a philosophy that some remedy be provided." (Citations omitted.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““No common law or statutory right to recover damages from the employer, his insurer, his broker, any service organization retained by the employer, his insurer or his broker to provide safety service, advice or recommendations for the employer or the agents or employees of any of them for injury or death sustained by any employee while engaged in the line of his duty as such employee, other than the compensation herein provided, is available to any employee who is covered by the provisions of this Act, * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The Workmen’s Compensation Act bars all suits for accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of employment. # ” ° It is generally held that injuries caused by wilful and wanton negligence of the employer are to be compensated by the Act; the only injuries, if any, outside the Act would be intentional torts.” (Emphasis added.) 28 Ill. App. 3d 373, 381 , 329 N.E.2d 1, 8 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.