Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Ill. App. 3d 411 - People v. Porter

28 Ill. App. 3d 411 - People v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2023

11 state decisions

40197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 39 Ill. 2d 482 - The People v. Nugara · 32 Ill. 2d 472 - The People v. Richardson · 15 Ill. App. 3d 23 - People v. Chambers · 17 Ill. App. 3d 482 - People v. Murphy · 15 Ill. App. 3d 445 - People v. Barrington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The requisite mental state for a crime may be proved by the acts and circumstances surrounding the defendant’s conduct. *** The fact that the criminal acts were not committed pursuant to a preconceived plan is not a defense if the evidence indicates involvement on the part of the accused in the spontaneous acts of the group. [Citation.] If the proof shows that the accused was present at the scene of the crime and did not disapprove or oppose it, the trier of fact may competently consider that conduct in connection with other circumstances and thereby reach the conclusion that the accused assented to the commission of the criminal act, lent to it his countenance and approval and was thereby aiding and abetting the crime. [Citations.]” (People v. Porter (1975), 28 Ill. App. 3d 411, 414 , 328 N.E.2d 618 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.