28 Ill. App. 3d 491 - People v. Hellemeyer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ ‘The introduction of testimony concerning dangerous weapons found among the belongings of a person charged with a crime, no part of which depends upon, the use or ownership of the weapon, has consistently been regarded as prejudicial error requiring a new trial.’ ” ( 28 Ill. App. 3d 491, 500 .)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 55 Ill. App. 3d 973 - People v. Slaughter

2. ““Applying Terry to the facts of the instant case, we find that officer Wuest was justified in making the stop of the defendants’ automobile for investigative purposes.” ( 28 Ill.App.3d 491, 495 , 328 N.E.2d 626, 630 .)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 34 Ill. App. 3d 990 - People v. Sanford

3. ““It is error to permit the prosecutor to prove, over defendant’s objection, that the defendant had refused to make a statement to the police.” (Citing cases) and”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Jerskey v. State