Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 Ind. 469

Armes v. Chappel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1867-11-15

<p>Judgment. — Appead after Payment. — The payment of a judgment is not a waiver of the right of appeal. '</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1867-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1904

6 state decisions

2018671870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ray, J.

¶1— The appellant sued the appellee before a justice of the peace. Answer, set-off. On the trial there was a finding and judgment for appellee. This judgment was, with the costs, paid; and subsequently, and within thirty days from the trial, an appeal was taken to the Court of Common Pleas. There, a motion to dismiss the appeal, because taken after payment of the judgment and costs, was overruled. An answer was then filed, averring the fact of such payment, and upon a demurrer being overruled to the same, judgment was rendered for the appellee.

J. W. Burton, for appellant.

¶2In the case of Dickensheets et al. v. Kaufman et al., ante p. 251, we held that payment of a judgment was not a waiver of the right of appeal by the judgment defendant. The demurrer to the answer should have been sustained.

¶3The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.

/28/ind/469 · .json · Public domain