Treschman v. Treschman’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably 45 Cal. 2d 421 - Emery v. Emery (1955), Dunlap v. Dunlap (1930)
5 federal appellate · 50 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Jones · Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Spilker · Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co v. Wynant · Stanley v. Sutherland · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]) father is legally bound to support his child, but he is not legally bound to support a stepchild”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“invested with the rights and charged with the duties of a parent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.