Sherwood v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1902
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1995
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Goode v. Riley · Paine v. Woods · Quick v. Taylor · Kellogg v. Malin · Burk v. Hill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the fact that land was bought for a particular purpose ... can make no difference in respect to the rule of damages, for a breach of the covenants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hudson v. McClaskey“the value which that specific part of the land bore to the value of the whole land conveyed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hudson v. McClaskey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.