28 Kan. App. 2d 760 - Mueller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ ‘The doctrine of unconstitutional conditions holds that government may not grant a benefit on the condition that the beneficiary surrender a constitutional right, even if the government may withhold drat benefit altogether. It reflects the triumph of the view that government may not do indirecdy what it may not do directly over the view that the greater power to deny a benefit includes the lesser power to impose a condition on its receipt.’ Sullivan, Unconstitutional Conditions, 102 Harv. L. Rev. 1413 , 1415 (1989).” Mueller v. State, 28 Kan. App. 2d 760, 766 , 24 P.3d 149 , rev. denied 271 Kan. 1037 (2001), cert. denied 535 U.S. 997 (2002).”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 33 Kan. App. 2d 773 - State v. Robinson · 36 Kan. App. 2d 568 - State v. Wahweotten