Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 Misc. 496

Banzhaf v. Ludwig

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1899-07-15

Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of Yew York, affirming a judgment of the Trial Term entered in favor of the plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order of affirmance.

Relies on Butler v. . Townsend

Decided 1899-07-15

Freedman, P. J.

¶1(concurring). The accident in question occurred before the passage of chapter 415 of the Laws of 1897, Icnown as the Labor Law. Under the law as it then stood, the •case at bar upon the facts disclosed falls within the doctrine of Butler v. Townsend, 126 N. Y. 105, and not within the decision of Stewart v. Ferguson, 34 App. Div. 515.

¶2I, therefore, concur with Mr. Justice MacLean that the case us submitted to the jury was submitted under erroneous instrue*499tions as to the law applicable, and for that reason the judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

¶3Leventbitt, J., concurring.

¶4Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.

/28/misc/496 · .json · Public domain