Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 Misc. 2d 501

Amos Parrish & Co. v. Kriegel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1960-07-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1967

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1960-07-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The notation on the check that it is an advance against commissions to be earned does not necessarily make the advance a loan, despite the added words “ to be adjusted every month”. Nor was the asserted agreement for a flat salary during the training period inconsistent with the commission arrangement. Hence there were triable issues both on the plaintiff’s cause of action and the counterclaim.

¶2The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied.

¶3Concur—Steuer, J. P., Hofstadter and Aurelio, JJ.

¶4Judgment and order reversed, etc.

/28/misc2d/501 · .json · Public domain