Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 Mo. 90

State v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1859

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1859-01-15

The following is the indictment in this case : “ The grand jurors, &c., present that John Gardner, of, &c., on, &c., at, I. The indictment is not good either upon the statute or at common law. (2 Bailey, 149; 8 Mo. 494; 1 Cliitt. G. L. 168.) It should have been stated that the acts constituting the offence were openly and notoriously committed; that the act was committed publicly, or in a public place, or in public view.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 1922

10 state decisions

4018591860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Rici-iardsoN, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The indictment not only charged the defendant generally in the words of the statute with being “ guilty of an open and notorious act of public indecency, grossly scandalous,” *91but specified with sufficient certainty the act that constituted the offence.

¶3The indictment was sufficient, and the judgment will be affirmed;

Judge Scott concurring. Judge Napton absent.
/28/mo/90 · .json · Public domain