Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 N.J. 133 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
February 1997
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1997 · most notably Dennis v. United States (1966), State v. Driver (1962)

3 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

48019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cicenia v. Lagay · State v. Tune · State v. Haas · State v. Hunt · State v. Mucci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon motion of a defendant made at any time after the filing of the indictment or accusation, the court shall order the prosecutor to permit the defendant to inspect and copy or photograph designated books, tangible objects, papers or documents other than written statements or confessions made by the defendant obtained from or belonging to the defendant and may, if the interests of justice so require, order the prosecutor to permit the defendant to inspect and copy or photograph written statements or confessions made by the defendant and designated books, tangible objects, papers or documents obtained from others except written statements or confessions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““* * * Hence we think it sufficient for a defendant to show that he does not recall his statement with sufficient detail to satisfy his counsel that he can fairly go to trial without it. In such circumstances, the application should be granted unless the State shows that the grant would ‘improperly hamper the prosecution.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It should with equal candor be conceded that a deficiency in our present handling of criminal matters is the lack of adequate facilities for factual investigation by defendants.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.