28 N.J. Super. 259 - Manda v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
2 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 1999
2 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McIntosh v. United States · 9 N.J. Super. 511 - In Re Application of Fitzpatrick · In Re Application of Kershner · 14 N.J. Super. 213 - In Re Application of Fitzpatrick · Kennedy v. Tennessee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party should not be put out of court if through error he selects the wrong form.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.