Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 NY2D 113 - People v. Licata

People v. Licata’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
9
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably Cooper v. People (1999), Hadges v. Yonkers Racing Corp. (1990)

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 29 state decisions

23019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc. · Rager v. McCloskey · Madden v. Queens County Jockey Club, Inc. · Aaron v. . Ward · Collister v. . Hayman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The word `remain' in the phrase `enter or remain' is designed to be applicable to cases in which a person enters with `license or privilege' but remains on the premises after the termination of such license or privilege."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The rule is well established that the operator of a race track can `exclude a person from attending its races * * * as long as the exclusion is not founded on race, creed, color or national origin.' * * * Moreover, the rules and regulations of the New York State Racing Commission specifically provide: `[Undesirable persons to be ejected] No person who is known or reputed to be a bookmaker or a vagrant within the meaning of the statutes of the State of New York, * * * shall enter or remain upon the premises of any licensed association conducting a race meeting under the jurisdiction of the commission; and all such persons shall upon discovery or recognition be forthwith ejected * * *' The regulation imposes upon the licensed association the burden of carefully screening its patrons, and excluding or expelling any undesirable persons." (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “conduct detrimental to the best interest of racing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.