Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Ohio App. 227 - Petitt v. Morton

28 Ohio App. 227 - Petitt v. Morton’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
6
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2025

12 state decisions

4019281930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edmund Gaines and Wife v. Beverly Chew Rich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . a ‘person interested’ is one who has a direct, immediate, and legally ascertained pecuniary interest in the devolution of the testator’s estate, such as would be impaired or defeated by the probate of the will or benefited by the declaration that it is invalid. The pecuniary interest must be direct and not of a sentimental nature, and it must have the characteristics of a property right and not of a mere personal privilege.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.