Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Ohio App. 3d 99 - Baker v. State

28 Ohio App. 3d 99 - Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction (1993), 107 Ohio App. 3d 231 - Mitchell v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation (1995)

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

14019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ 1. The state is not liable, for failure to provide protective custody, to an inmate who was injured in a state correctional facility by other inmates where the state did not have adequate notice of an impending assault.* * * “2. The state is not liable, for failure to have sufficient guards, to an inmate who was injured in a state correctional facility by other inmates where there is expert testimony that the procedures in question were adequate and there were no formal, written rules to the contrary.* * *” (Emphasis sic.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “his cell mate's locker and crouching in a defensive posture. Id. at ¶ 10. In affirming a judgment of the Court of Claims in favor of DRC, this court found that the behavior of the inmate/assailant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.