Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 OHIOST3D 451 - State v. Glenn

State v. Glenn’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
September 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Garner (1995), State v. Cooey (1989)

5 federal appellate · 59 state decisions

31019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia · Eddings v. Oklahoma · Proffitt v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is uncontroverted that the victim fulfilled all the above requirements and that he was duly appointed and was in the process of activities performed pursuant to his duties to enforce Ohio’s laws. * * “We therefore conclude that one who acts as a reserve or special deputy sheriff is a peace officer as that term is utilized in R.C. 2929.04(A)(6) and 109.71.” (Citations omitted.) 28 Ohio St.3d at 453-454 , 28 OBR at 503, 504 N.E.2d at 705.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the case at hand, the reference to appellant's prior incarceration was an isolated incident that was fleeting in nature. The trial judge gave a clear and unequivocal instruction to the jury that it was to disregard [the witness's] statement and not consider it for any reason. In light of the trial court's curative instruction, we have no reason to believe that the jury failed to disregard the statement. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a mistrial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Appellant also introduced evidence as to his poor environment and background. Appellant was raised in an environment of poverty. He received little attention from his natural father. He had been truant and had educational and disciplinary problems as a boy. Appellant had extensive contact with his church when he was younger. He also required special education classes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.