Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 Okla. 489

114 P 698

Manes v. Hoss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1911

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1911-03-21

<p> Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. </p> <p>Action between W. H. Manes and Raymond Hoss. From the judgment, Manes brings error.</p>

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““A motion for a new trial is unnecessary to enable this court to review the action of a trial court in rendering- a judgment upon the pleadings (Burdett et al. v. Burdett et al., 26 Okla. 416 , 109 Pac. 922 [35 L. R. A. (N. S.) 964]); and where a motion for new trial is unnecessary to present for review to this court the matters complained of in the petition in error, the filing of such motion and decision thereon by the court is ineffectual for the purpose of extending the time within which to perfect an appeal, and the time begins to run from the rendition of the judgment appealed from, and not from the order overruling the motion for a new trial. Springfield Fire & M. Ins. Co. v. Gish, Brook & Co., 23 Okla. 824 , 102 Pac. 708 .””

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Coleman v. Adams, Healy v. Davis

Relies on Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Gish, Brook & Co. · The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r. · Burdett v. Burdett

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed · Decided 1911-03-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 1953

17 state decisions

12019111920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HAYES, J.

¶1 Judgment was rendered in the court below on December 18, 1909. Petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on the 17th day of December, 1910. There was no waiver of summons, and no prtecipe therefor wa$ filed and issuance of summons had until the 21st day of December, 1910. The judgment in the court below was upon the pleadings. Not only must a petition in error and case-made or transcript be filed in this court within one year from the rendition of the judgment appealed from (section 6082, Snyder’s Comp. Laws of Okla. 1909), but there must be filed within said time a praecipe for summons *490 and summons issued, unless tbe same be waived. McMurtry v. Byrd et al., 23 Okla. 597, 101 Pac. 1117; C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Bradham, 24 Okla. 205, 103 Pac. 591.

¶2 A motion for a new trial is unnecessary to enable this court to review the action of a trial court in rendering a judgment upon the pleadings (Burdett et al. v. Burdett et al., 26 Okla. 416, 109 Pac. 922), and where a motion for a new trial is unnecessary to present for review to this court the matters complained of in the petition in error, the filing of such motion and decision thereon by the court is ineffectual for the purpose of extending the time within which to perfect an appeal; and the time begins to run from the rendition of the judgment appealed from, and not from the order overruling the motion for a new trial. Springfield Fire & M. Ins. Co. v. Gish, Brook & Co., 23 Okla. 824, 102 Pac. 708.

¶3 The motion to dismiss is sustained.

All the Justices concur.
/28/okla/489 · .json · Public domain