Furstenburg v. Brissey’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1956
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r. · Saxon v. White · Seward v. Casler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The maintaining of any slaughterhouse or location and use' of any graveyard or cemetery in violation of. the provisions of this Article, is declared to be a nuisance, and any person owning real estate within any.such addition to a town or city, or within lands so platted and set apart to be sold for residence purposes may maintain an action in the courts to abate such nuisance and to enjoin their continuance, and if it appears that they are being carried on in violation of ■this Article, a perpetual injunction shall be granted against the parties maintaining such nuisance.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. Queenan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.