Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 Okla. 857 - Terry v. Creed

Terry v. Creed’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 1958
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 1958

17 state decisions

9019111920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Howard v. Farrar · Puls v. Casey · Hassell v. Morgan · Meierholtz v. Territory of Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellate courts reluctantly disturb the verdicts of a jury that have been approved by the trial court; but it is the well-settled rule of this jurisdiction that if there is no evidence reasonably tending to establish a material issue submitted to the jury under the instructions of the court, which they must have found in favor of the prevailing party in order to return the verdict returned, the verdict will be set aside. Howard et al. v. Farrar, 28 Okla. 490 , 114 Pac. 695 ; Hassell v. Morgan et al., 27 Okla. 453 , 112 Pac. 969 ; Puls v. Casey, 18 Okla. 142 , 92 Pac. 388 ; Meierholtz v. Territory, 14 Okla. 359 , 78 Pac. 90 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.