Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neitzel v. State · State v. Wentz · Pruett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(ilt is not clear whether the legislature intended in enacting the first-degree weapons misconduct statute to require proof of recklessness or criminal negligence when it required proof that the defendant discharged a firearm under cireumstances manifesting a substantial and unjustifiable risk of physical injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hutton v. State“proof that the defendant acted recklessly, or at least negligently, with respect to the possibility that discharge of a firearm might endanger someone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hutton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.