Spreen v. Spreen’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 212 - Bering v. Share · 95 Wash. 2d 94 - Wagner v. Wagner · 125 Wash. 2d 865 - In Re the Marriage of Short · 66 Wash. 2d 503 - Lambert v. Lambert · 101 Wash. 2d 168 - In Re the Marriage of Washburn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a proceeding for dissolution of the marriage . . . the court shall . . . make such disposition of the property and the liabilities of the parties, either community or separate, as shall appear just and equitable after considering all relevant factors including, but not limited to: (1) The nature and extent of the community property; (2) The nature and extent of the separate property; (3) The duration of the marriage; and (4) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of property is to become effective.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Substantial evidence supports a factual determination if the record contains sufficient evidence to persuade a fair-minded, rational person of the truth of that determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“modify a maintenance award when the moving party shows a substantial change in circumstances that the parties did not contemplate at the time of the dissolution decree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.