Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 P.3d 780 - State v. Summers

State v. Summers’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Neder v. United States · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Attwood v. Singletary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the current case law in Washington, when a trial court fails to include an essential element in a `to convict' instruction, it is a manifest constitutional error that requires automatic reversal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[trial] counsel can hardly be faulted for requesting a jury instruction based upon a then-unquestioned WPIC 16.02.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`would convince an unprejudiced, thinking mind of the truth of the fact to which the evidence is directed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.