Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

28 S.C.L. 127

Wallace v. Dyson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 15, 1842

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1842-11-15

Before Earle, J., at Newberry, Fall Term, 1842. Assumpsit. The plaintiff declared upon several instruments of writing as promissory notes, under the statute of Anne.

Decided 1842-11-15

¶1Curia, per

Earle, J.

¶2It is an essential quality of a pro*128missory note under the statute, that it should be for the payment of money only, and not for the payment of money land the performance of some other act. It was so held in Martin vs. Chauntry, Str. 1271, which has been followed ever since. The statement of the consideration as “ for the hire of negroes, (naming them,) for the present year,” would in no degree invalidate the paper as a promissory note. But three out of four of the instruments sued on, contain other stipulations, to furnish clothing, pay taxes, not to pay physician’s bills, and the like. These are mere agreements, and must be sued on as such.

¶3The motion for a new trial is granted. As one of the instruments sustains the action, the plaintiff has leave to amend his declaration as to the others.

Richardson, O’Neall, Evans, Bdtler, and Wardlaw, JJ. concurred.
/28/scl/127 · .json · Public domain