Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 So. 2d 134 - Gilbert v. Tullman

28 So. 2d 134 - Gilbert v. Tullman’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1974
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1974

4 state decisions

201946195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woods v. City Nat Bank & Trust Co of Chicago · Backus v. Finkelstein · Ritchie Grocer Co. v. Dean · Hanna v. Clark · Frierson Co. v. Murray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`When an account is rendered and no objection is made within a reasonable time, it is a prima facie admission that the account is correct, unless rebutted. Ritchie Grocer Co. v. Dean, 182 La. 518 , 162 So. 62 ; Frierson Co., Inc. v. Murray, La.App., 190 So. 132 . "`Considering the above authorities, we think the account is proven when Gilbert testified that he made it up and that he had personal knowledge of the correctness of each individual item. * * *'" 28 So.2d 135 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"We are of the opinion that plaintiff made sufficient proof of the account unless defendant shows that it is incorrect, which he has not done. It is true that he says he complained about some things on the account, and that plaintiff promised to adjust it but never did. Defendant did not point out any particular items on the account that were not correct." 28 So.2d 137 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.