Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 28 SO2D 755 - Fields v. Brown Paper Mill Co.

Fields v. Brown Paper Mill Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1963
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1963

4 state decisions

20194619501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kern v. Southport Mill, Ltd. · Myers v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. · Pierre v. Barringer · Piske v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co. · Clark v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining, therefore, whether an accident ‘arose out of the employment, it is necessary to consider only this: (1) Was the employee then engaged about his employer’s business and not merely pursuing his own business or pleasure; and (2) did the necessities of that employer’s business reasonably require that the employee be at the place of the accident at the time the accident occurred?””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"If an employee not otherwise eliminated from the benefits of this Chapter, receives personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, his employer shall pay compensation in the amounts, on the conditions, and to the person or persons hereinafter designated." LSA-R.S. 23:1031. (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.